T* /content/aba-cms-dotorg/en/groups/litigation/committees/pretrial-practice-discovery/practice/2017/how-to-make-good-objections-to-written-discovery, Make it a lead-off general objection.. trey parker house kauai; mccormick and schmick's prosecco sangria recipe; katherine bouris wife; Payroll Services. f T* /TT1 12 Tf 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o C)-2.1 (om)-2 (pa)3.9 (n)-10.7 (y)20.7 ( \()-7.7 (\223)3.9 (M)-10.1 (onsa)1.9 (nt)-1.9 (o\224)3 (\))3 ( he)4.9 (r)-7.8 (e)3.9 (b)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( r)-6.9 (e)3.9 (sp)-1.8 (on)-10.9 (ds)-1.9 ( pur)3.8 (su)-1.8 (a)3 (nt)-1.9 ( t)-2 (o C)-3.9 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (f)3.8 (or)3 (ni)-1.9 (a)3 ( )-9.9 (C)-3 (ode)3.9 ( of)3.9 ( C)-3.8 (i)-2 (vi)-1.9 (l)-1.2 ( )]TJ 1028. /Parent 15 0 R [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-5.8 (S)-4 ( )]TJ 3. 50 0 obj (24)Tj EMC /TT2 12 Tf /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] q /Fm0 Do 2.59 -24 Td /GS0 gs [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o ot)-1.1 (he)3.1 (r)2.9 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.8 ( )]TJ REQUESTED DISCOVERY IS NOT CRITICAL TO PROVING THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OR DEFENSES endobj q 36 -24 Td /Filter /FlateDecode BT W n endobj [(\226 )-49.9 (c)4.7 (he)3.1 (m)8.9 (i)-2.7 (c)4.7 (a)3.1 (l )-42.9 (i)-1.1 (n )-50.8 (1985. /Parent 15 0 R 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm -72 -24 Td -72 -24 Td T* T* 4. endobj -6 -24 Td Q (22)Tj /TT0 11.03 Tf EMC q [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. (16)Tj (28)Tj >> 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm 65.4 648.61 Td x+ | [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. Responding to such requests and interrogatory would be oppressive, unduly burdensome, and unnecessarily expensive, and the burden of responding to such requests and interrogatory is substantially the same or less for Defendant as for Plaintiff. All such information, prepared in anticipation of litigation and not disclosed or otherwise maintained in a way that is inconsistent with the purpose of the privilege, is protected by the work product doctrine. )-100.1 ([)-6.1 (Th)10.9 (i)-1.9 (s )-51.1 (R)-3.9 (e)4.8 (q)9.2 (ue)4.8 (s)8.2 (t)-2 ( )-49.1 (i)-2.9 (s )-42 (l)-2 (i)-2 (st)-3.1 (e)3.1 (d )-49.1 (a)13.9 (s )-51.8 (No)12.9 (. (27)Tj T* See my blog " Make Sure you are aware of the New Document Response Requirements" for an updated analysis. /TT1 12 Tf /Annots [] 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re [(a)4 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.9 (n)-20 (y)20 ( t)-2 (i)-2 (m)-2 (e)4 ( a)4.8 (nd f)3 (or)2.2 ( )-10 (a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)4 (so)-1.8 (n,)-1.8 ( t)-3.8 (o r)2.9 (e)3.2 (vi)-2 (se)2.9 (, su)-1.8 (pp)-1.8 (l)-3 (e)4 (m)-12 (e)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (, c)3.9 (or)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (, a)4.8 (dd t)-2.8 (o, or)3.8 ( )-9.9 (c)3 (l)-1.9 (a)-5.1 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (f)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( t)-1.9 (h)-10 (e)3 (se)2.3 ( R)-2.9 (e)3.8 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (e)4.8 (s.)-11.8 ( )]TJ Before serving this document, make an appointment for free legal information and advice at one of the Legal Help Centers. T* [(3)-1.296 ( )]TJ >> [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.6 (R)-3 (e)3 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (e)3.9 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.9 (o pl)-2 (a)4 (i)-2 (nt)-2 (i)-1.1 (f)2 (f)3 (\222)3.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (a)2.9 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( )-10.8 (m)-1.1 (a)3 (de)4 ( w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 (hout)-2 ( w)2 (a)4.8 (i)-2.8 (vi)-2 (ng)10 ( t)-1.1 (h)-10.9 (e)4 ( r)3.8 (i)-1.9 (g)9 (ht)-1.8 (, )]TJ >> Attendance at such interviews was limited to, at most, the interviewee, Antitrust Division attorneys and staff, counsel for the interviewee (in some interviews), and a potential testifying expert economist (in some interviews). 66 0 obj Q [(C)-2.1 (a)3 (li)-4 (f)2 (or)3 (ni)-1.9 (a)3.9 ( but)-1.9 ( w)1.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (n t)-2 (he)3 ( U)2 (ni)-1.9 (t)-1.1 (e)3 (d S)-2.8 (t)-2 (a)3 (te)1.1 (s,)-2 (\224)2.9 ( a)4.9 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-2.8 (e)4.8 ( de)3.1 (a)4 (dl)-1.9 (i)-2 (ne)4 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (e)3.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (nde)3.1 (d b)-19 (y)9.9 ( 10 c)4 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (e)4 (nda)-5.1 (r)2.1 ( da)-16 (y)20.8 (s)-1.8 (\))3.8 (. 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm 30.72 0 Td Q (22)Tj /Parent 15 0 R << Therefore, there are no "third part[ies]" as that term is defined. q /Resources 71 0 R << 78.23 0 Td )]TJ A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. -332.51 -24 Td T* endobj A request for such a log is unreasonable and unduly burdensome in light of the work product doctrine and other privileges protecting such internal documents from discovery. /TT0 12 Tf Project objectives often include both objectives and goals.Project objectives should not be confused with project management objectives. )]TJ T* This is a general first set request for admissions that is narrowly tailored to the specific facts of the case. q 1. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.7952 75.2636 Tm [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o t)-1.1 (he)3.1 (se)1.9 ( R)-2.8 (e)4.7 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.8 (un)-1.8 (r)-8.8 (e)4.8 (a)4 (so)-1.8 (na)1.3 (b)-10 (l)-11.1 (y)19 ( c)4 (um)-1.9 (ul)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (i)-2 (ve)4 ( )-9.1 (a)3.9 (nd/)-1.9 (or)2.1 ( )]TJ [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (ndum)-1.8 ( )]TJ endobj (21)Tj Responding party objects that the request seeks documents already in plaintiff's possession custody or control. (5)Tj >> 49.55 0 Td << 0 -791.16 l BT stream Moreover, Plaintiff does not waive its right to amend its responses. Plaintiff objects to each document request and interrogatory that is overly broad, unduly burdensome, or not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 4. [(1)-1.296 ( )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf /Type /Outlines [#] AND REQUEST FOR ORDER AWARDING MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT AND DEFENSE COUNSEL IN THE SUM OF $560.00; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES /Fm1 Do [(t)-1.9 (ha)4.7 (t)-2.7 ( t)-2 (he)4.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (d doc)3.2 (um)-1.9 (e)3.8 (nt)-1.8 ( )]TJ 168.288 -24 Td (13)Tj )10.8 ( )]TJ RESPONDING PARTY: ACME, INC . Plaintiff does not and cannot know "all facts known" (emphasis supplied) to such individuals and entities that are relevant to the claims at issue here. /Type /Page /TT0 12 Tf 1 0 obj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm (19)Tj T* (2. /TT1 12 Tf [(m)-1.1 (a)3.1 (t)-2 (t)-1.1 (e)3 (r)3 ( c)4.9 (ont)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (ne)3.1 (d i)-1.1 (n a)3.1 (n)-19.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)-7 (e)4 (sp)-2 (on)-2 (s)-2 (e)3.9 (. T* q (m)Tj 5. (19)Tj /TT1 12 Tf )2 ( )]TJ >> -44.76 -24 Td ( )Tj Q Prevent flooding in the community by building gabions and digging trenches by the last phase of the project. (17)Tj (16)Tj 156.829 43.19 Td T* /Type /Font The party, person, or attorney did not respond in good faith to a request for production of documents made pursuant to Section 2020.010, 2020.410, 2020.510, or 2025.210, or to an inspection demand made pursuant to Section 2031.010. /Type /Metadata endstream 5. 44.77 0 Td This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to initial . Q << endobj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.595 75.2636 Tm It went like this: I read your article Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, and filed a Motion to Strike Defendants Preliminary Statement and Unmeritorious Objections. The Preliminary Statement contained many of the issues you pointed out in your article, and each of defendants responses to interrogatories and document requests contained the same 28 lines of objections. Rule 33 (Interrogatories to Parties) also requires specificity when making objections. endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /TT0 12 Tf Endnote. f stream Using discovery to reach evaluation, mediation and trial goals, One of the most common questions I am asked is: when does the clock start regarding bringing motions to compel written discovery? [(19 i)-1.1 (n P)5 (l)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)8.9 (nt)8 (i)-2.8 (f)3.8 (f)13 (s)-1.7 (\222)3.7 ( A)12 (m)-2.7 (e)4.7 (nd)9.2 (e)14.8 (d a)4 (nd )10 (S)-4.7 (uppl)-2 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (e)4.7 (nt)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( R)-3.9 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (f)2 (or)3.8 ( )9.1 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-2.1 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()11.9 (J)-10.9 (u)9.9 (ne)4 ( 29, 2017\))2.1 (])-6 (. 37.07 0 Td 47 0 obj Secure .gov websites use HTTPS /Name /ZaDb /Length 143 0 R /TT0 12 Tf ^ci|kFC5iCPTZGhG9#cvwz&>2/DxHI4l zl}RtvNM,rru-mIi1n.~,aX2l:Kz pKbQ}"nDo,4noiI[6Qv,m, ,%}?T\8 Y Xem)f,]jmGnVYye^|lY5j2)_`gG<7fGyjW$6]k@ MB-Mm~S-O$ pUxqHCxPiJSN endobj f Defendant's document requests and interrogatory call for the production of documents and information that were produced to the Plaintiff by other entities and that may contain confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information. 3 to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. endobj T* will be included in the production."] 2 "A statement that the party to whom a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling has been directed will comply with the particular demand shall state that the production, inspection, copying, testing, or sampling, and related activity demanded, will be allowed either in whole or in part, and . u%-T\=\5j8XZjH6/A Pga$plDW;XSVLiY5$Lz3V.)g[JD?aRP#e)6(]_$^"JcJ*YiMQV /TT0 12 Tf /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 21 0 obj [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-5.8 (S)]TJ /Resources 51 0 R /Font 135 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode T* 1) The time to respond to a discovery request is 30 days after the Rule 26 (f) conference 2) Objections to Rule 34 [must] be stated with specificity 3) Production deadlines set within the ESI agreement must be adhered to 4) The producing party must state whether they are withholding . 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm /TT0 11.03 Tf /Kids [14 0 R 15 0 R] 58 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 214.8 0 Td ( )Tj /AcroForm 6 0 R Plaintiff will treat this request as if it called for documents (1) that contain, include, or are derived from any statement made by a third party to the DOJ and (2) that were signed and/or adopted, formally or informally, by that third party. T* ( )Tj /TT0 12 Tf << f (28)Tj /Type /Pages /Length 149 0 R 3, Plaintiff requested that Defendant: "Identify and produce a complete copy of any and all written or official certification of Defendant Lugo receiving or being issue training and/or supervision regarding (CSP-LAC) written policy and procedure issuing out loss of privilege from January 16, 2014 to December 31, 2019." [(of)3 ( C)-3 (i)-1.1 (vi)-2 (l)-2 ( P)-4.9 (r)3 (oc)4.8 (e)3.1 (dur)3.1 (e)4.8 (, Mo)-1.8 (ns)-12.8 (a)3 (nto)-1.9 (\222)1.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-3.1 (e)3 (sp)-1.6 (on)-1.6 (s)-1.8 (e)3.9 (s )-1.8 (a)3.8 (r)-7.8 (e)4 ( not)-1.9 ( )-9.2 (due)3.9 ( \223)3.1 (w)2 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (n t)-2 (hi)-2 (r)2.9 (t)-11.9 (y)19 ( \()3.9 (30)-9.9 (\))2 ( da)-5 (y)19 (s)-10.9 ( f)-6.1 (r)2 (om )-2 (t)-3 (he)3.1 ( da)4 (t)-2 (e)4.8 ( of)3 ( )]TJ Nail Down Whether the Documents You are Seeking ever Existed and Where They are Now, A Needle in a Haystack When Opposing Party Dumps Documents. /Resources 111 0 R (24)Tj Q 33 0 obj ( )Tj 63 0 obj ET 168.84 0 Td (1. -103.32 -24 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 102.9337315 216.752748 cm 96.837 -24 Td /TT1 12 Tf [( t)-1.1 (hi)-2 (s )-2 (R)-4.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-3 (. BT q [(D)1.1 (E)-2.1 (N)1.1 (IE)-3.1 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ [(a)4 (nd )9.9 (S)-3 (up)9.1 (p)10 (l)-2 (e)4 (m)-2 (e)14 (nt)-2 (a)13.9 (l )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-4 (s )-2 (f)2 (or)2.9 ( )10.1 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-1.4 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()1.9 (J)-11.7 (une)3.9 ( )20.8 (29, 2017\))2.1 (])-6 (. /Length 155 0 R /Type /Catalog Listening to the list of objections, it was clear that the opposing party had failed to assert the objections in good faith as the objections included a General Objection preamble and every response included the same boilerplate garbage objections. (14)Tj (25)Tj )]TJ (22)Tj /TT1 12 Tf /Kids [19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R] endobj /Length 132 0 R T* Q 12 i)-1.9 (n )]TJ 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the definition of "statement" to any comment, observation, remark, observation, or affirmation, whether in written or oral form, made by a third party to Plaintiff during the Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 investigation. endobj /TT1 12 Tf Q (6)Tj See Objections 3-4 to Instructions and Definitions ("Objections 3-4"). /TT1 12 Tf Plaintiff objects to this document request as overbroad, burdensome, vague, and ambiguous to the extent that it relies on the term "reflecting," which is not defined in Dentsply's Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories. [(i)-1.1 (f)2.1 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (st)-4.7 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. q )]TJ 1 g << %PDF-1.3 (15)Tj [( t)-1.1 (hi)-2 (s )-2 (R)-4.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-3 (. Q /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm endobj /Parent 14 0 R NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER VERIFIED RESPONSES TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS, AND FOR A TRIAL CONTINUANCE AND MONETARY SANCTIONS )]TJ )25.903 (1)]TJ ET T* The materials thus provide at least a snapshot of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government personnel attending the interviews. /Filter /FlateDecode endobj >> (5. Q ( )Tj >> 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm /TT0 12 Tf /Length 138 0 R Q 0 0 m [(a)4 (r)3.8 (e)4 ( not)-1.9 ( j)-2 (us)-1.9 (t)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)4.8 (d b)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( t)-2.8 (he)4.8 ( sc)-8.7 (i)-2 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)3 (i)-2 (c)3.9 ( e)4.9 (vi)-1.9 (de)3.9 (nc)-5.9 (e)3.9 (.\224)]TJ stream /TT0 8.03 Tf /TT1 12 Tf Aspose Ltd. 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R] 111.6 0 Td )]TJ (12)Tj [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (nd)-9 (um)-2.9 ( da)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-1.9 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)2.2 (om)-1.1 ( )]TJ /Type /Page Comply with Rule 34s requirement that you state whether any responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of the objection. << /Resources 95 0 R (17)Tj /TT0 12 Tf /Fm1 Do 2031.280(a) was amended on 1/1/2020 to read: (a) Any documents or category of documents produced in response to a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall be identified with the specific request number to which the documents respond. endobj [( t)-2 (ha)4 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.7 ( c)3.2 (i)-1.9 (t)-1.2 (e)3.1 (d doc)4 (um)-1.9 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (a)3.8 ( f)3 (or)2.1 (mal a)-6 (ge)3.9 (nc)-15.9 (y)19 ( de)-5 (t)-2 (e)3 (r)3 (m)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on of)2 ( EPA. T* T* /BaseFont /ZapfDingbats /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] In the course of its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff interviewed a number of individuals, but interviewed none pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009, a document request issued to Dentsply. [(e)4.8 (t)-11.9 ( seq. The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. endobj T* >> /quotesingle 96 /grave 128 /bullet /dagger /daggerdbl /ellipsis /emdash /endash (3)Tj [( t)-1.9 (ha)3 (t )-2 (t)-3 (he)3 ( 1983 pa)4 (t)-1.9 (hol)-2 (og)-10 (y)20.8 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.7 (por)3 (t)-1.8 ( of)2.8 ( t)-1.8 (he)3 ( )-9.9 (st)-4 (ud)-10 (y)20.8 ( B)-3 (D)2 (N)2 (-)2.1 (77-)3 (420 )]TJ DEFENDANT PAUL SAMPLE 'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OR THINGS SET ONE of requesting party, and the set number. 2030.060(d). The propounding party had placed the definitions of specific terms in a preamble. 1: Interrogatory No. Responding party objects that it is unduly burdensome and overbroad. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 312.9666 86.2909 Tm )25.903 (1)]TJ In the previous blog, Start Preparing Your Motion Because with These Responses Youre Going to Court, I used the following example as a type of response I see as a Discovery Referee: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory to the extent that it seeks documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. 48 0 Td /XObject 146 0 R ET 29 0 obj ( )Tj f 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm endobj [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o t)-1.1 (he)3.1 (se)1.9 ( R)-2.8 (e)4.7 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.9 (o t)-1.9 (he)4.7 ( e)4 (x)-10.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-2 ( t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-2 ( t)-1.9 (he)-5.2 (y)19.1 ( s)-10.9 (e)4.7 (e)4 (k t)-1.9 (o i)-2 (m)-2.8 (pose)2.7 ( a)-6.7 ( )]TJ stream Court408 F.3d 1142, 2005 WL 1175 922 (9th Cir.2005) [trial court affirmed in holding boilerplate objection without identification of documents is not the proper assertion of a privilege. [(a)4 (de)4.8 (nom)-2.8 (a)4.8 (s,)-1.8 ( a)1.2 ( )-9.8 (r)3.7 (a)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (um)-2.9 (or)3.8 (, i)-2.7 (n a)4.7 ( dose)1.3 (-)3 (r)-6.1 (e)3 (late)3 (d m)-1.9 (a)4.8 (nn)-9.9 (e)3.1 (r)2.9 (. /TT0 12 Tf /Outlines 4 0 R Furthermore, Defendant has access to the addresses and/or telephone numbers of those persons listed on Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and can seek information by addressing formal or informal discovery directly from those entities. T* Responding party objects that plaintiff has equal access to these documents. /Filter /FlateDecode endobj 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re /TT1 12 Tf /TT1 12 Tf 29.4 648.61 Td << Similarly, the subpoena recipient may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena in the court where compliance is required. [(4)-1.296 ( )]TJ >>
Winchester Knife 4660714a,
Dexter Mi Webcam,
St Luke's The Woodlands Visitor Policy,
Articles S
