decision sent to author nature rejectgeordan murphy wife aneka

A place to discuss all things biology! Internet Explorer). Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? GSA Bulletin: gsab@geosociety.org Revised Submission Nearly all manuscripts are returned to the author with suggestions for revision, condensation, or final polish. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. Decisions are reversed. [CDATA[// > Is my manuscript likely to be peer reviewed by now? My father emptied the thing at an unknown date ruining my spontaneous project, but at least I was able to recover the skull, jaw, spine & ribs. Papers may be rejected without review if they are inappropriate for the journal, clearly of poor quality, previously published, etc. What could this mean? Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. r/biology I buried a dead rat (killed by delayed rat poison or a neighbor's cat) in an iron barrel with soil on Sep 8. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. If authors prefer not to make the review history of their paper at Nature Plants known to a new journal, they should not use the transfer service and they should make a new submission instead; the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. Yes who will be interested in the new results and why. Often, a positive-toned review will have concerns similar to those. //-->